Flagship course

Service Health Dashboards

An eight-week cohort for people who must turn noisy telemetry into a durable visualization and analytics approach for IT service health tracking.

Colorful data visualization screens

Learning outcomes

  • Define a service health model that separates leading indicators from lagging pain.
  • Compose primary and drill-down boards that keep severity readable under stress.
  • Wire correlation views across metrics, logs samples, and change calendars.
  • Facilitate a monthly health review with stakeholders who are not on-call.
  • Document visualization decisions so the next engineer can maintain the board.

At a glance

Format: Live cohort + async critiques

Duration: 8 weeks · ~6 hours per week

Tools: Tool-agnostic; Grafana, Looker Studio, Power BI, or custom stacks welcome

Price (informational): MYR 4,850 per seat — see pricing for tier context. No checkout on this site.

Modules

  1. Health vocabulary & boundary maps

    Align on what “healthy” means per service tier. Draw dependency envelopes before opening a chart editor.

  2. Signal selection & sampling honesty

    Choose SLIs, error budgets, and saturation proxies. Practice labeling partial data so viewers never mistake silence for green.

  3. Primary board composition

    Build the five-second view: status, trend, and blast radius. Critique sessions focus on hierarchy, not decorative flourishes.

  4. Correlation & change overlays

    Layer deployments, tickets, and third-party status. Learn when juxtaposition helps and when it invents false causes.

  5. Stakeholder narratives & handoff kits

    Package weekly digests, escalation snippets, and a maintenance runbook so boards outlive the cohort.

Instructor

Portrait of instructor Farah Lim

Farah Lim

Farah spent a decade in reliability and analytics roles for logistics and telco platforms in Malaysia and Singapore. She now coaches teams on turning observability estates into decision surfaces — with a bias toward readable restraint over chart sprawl.

Course FAQ

Do I need a specific visualization tool?

No. Critiques evaluate signal design and layout logic. You may use Grafana, Power BI, Looker Studio, Metabase, or internal tooling. We do not provide vendor licenses.

Can I join if my data cannot leave the company network?

Yes. Many learners use synthetic series or redacted exports. Screenshare during critique is optional; annotated stills are accepted.

What is a real limitation of this course?

We do not implement pipeline engineering or agent installation. If your telemetry is missing or broken, visualization practice alone will not invent trustworthy signals — you will need platform work in parallel.

Is payment handled on this website?

No. Pricing here is informational. Enrolment and invoicing happen through a separate conversation after you contact us.

Learner notes

Module 4 forced us to put change markers on the same canvas as latency. We caught a weekly batch job we had blamed on “network weather” for months.

Client in logistics IT · after Service Health Dashboards
★★★★☆

Clear facilitation. The peer critique template is something I still paste into Confluence. Deducted a star because the sample dataset for retail POS was thinner than the cloud-native one.

Verified learner · platform-style review

Next cohort seats

Share your role and current tooling. We will confirm dates and send informational fee details — no payment form on this page.

Request cohort details